Ufa, Russian Federation
5.9.6
81-139
The article analyzes the features of the lexical-semantic field “crime” and its verbalization, i.e. functioning in the artistic discourse. It is emphasized that the meaning of the term “lexical-semantic field” is interpreted ambiguously in linguistics, which leads to different methods of its analysis. Based on this postulate, the following paradigm of methods is proposed as a methodological basis for the study: component, etymological, contrastive, cognitive. It is noted that when analyzing the lexical-semantic field, it is advisable to pay attention, firstly, to its structure, namely, to the core and periphery of semantic features, and. secondly, to the denotative component reflecting the general logical concept embedded in the word, and the connotative component adding additional semantic shades. It is concluded that the study of lexical-semantic fields is relevant, since they reflect the structure of the language and provide an opportunity to explore various properties and relationships of lexical units.
lexical-semantic field, legal concept, artistic discourse, legal term, verbalization, culturally specific, dicteme
1. Nikandrova I. A. On the Relationship between the Concepts of “Functional-Semantic Class of Words” and “Lexical-Semantic Group” // Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series 2. Philology and Art Criticism. 2010. No. 3. P. 173–177. (In Russ.)
2. Popova L. V. Crime as a name of a concept in the history of the Russian linguistic picture of the world // Bulletin of Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Ufa, 2022. No. 1 (95). P. 135–141. (In Russ.)
3. Petrova E. A. Logical and cognitive interpretation of substantive-nominative propositions in dictemic discursivity: dis. ... of Doctor of Philology. Ufa: BashSU, 2012. 416 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kuznetsova A. M. From component analysis to component synthesis. M.: Nauka, 1986. 123 p. (In Russ.)
5. Simms W. G. Wigwam and Cabin. University of Arkansas Press, 2000. 413 p.
