Murino, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
343.139
The article analyzes the main directions of the implementation of the principle of adversarial parties in the consideration of a criminal case in a simplified criminal procedure form, which is expressed in the application of a special procedure of legal proceedings with the consent of the accused with the indictment. The author resolves a number of controversial issues related to the operation of the adversarial principle not only in the case of non-recognition of the accused’s guilt in the crime committed, but also in the situation of its full recognition. The possibility of applying a special procedure in case of disagreement of the accused with the claims in a criminal case is considered. The article analyzes the features of the implementation of the principle of adversarial parties in a special procedure of legal proceedings, when the accused agreed with the charge, and the defense lawyer objects to this against the will of the latter. Optimization of the defender’s actions in such a situation is extremely relevant, and therefore possible options for his actions are considered.
court, special procedure, principle of adversarial nature of the parties, adversarial nature, sim plified criminal procedure form
1. Rogava I. G., Danilenko N. E. Problems of implementation of the principles of criminal proceedings when considering a case in a special order // Trends in the development of science and education. 2020. No. 7-6. P. 88–91. (In Russ.)
2. Ugolovnyy process: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. V. P. Bozh'eva, B. Ya. Gavrilova. 7-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurayt, 2020. 490 s.
3. Begova D. Ya. Osobyy poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred'yavlennym obvineniem v kontekste spravedlivogo sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. T. 36. 2020. № 4. S. 148‒152.
4. Piyuk A. V. Theoretical foundations for simplifying the forms of resolving criminal cases by the court in the Russian Federation: typological aspect: author. diss. … Dr. of law. Tomsk, 2017. 38 p. (In Russ.)
5. Mashinnikova N. O., Tat'yanina L. G. Diskussionnye voprosy sootnosheniya osobogo poryadka sudoproizvodstva s prezumpciyami rossiyskogo ugolovnogo processa // Evraziyskaya advokatura. 2019. № 4. S. 35‒37.
6. Kalugin A. G., Monid M. V. A special procedure for making a court decision with the consent of the accused with the charge brought against him. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2006. 200 p. (In Russ.)
7. Shestakova S. D. Problems of competition in the Russian criminal process: diss. … cand. of law. SPb., 1998. 184 p. (In Russ.)
8. Matkina D. V. Conventional form of trial: history, modernity and development prospects: author. diss. ... cand. of law. Orenburg, 2009. P. 6–7. (In Russ.)
9. On advocacy and advocacy in the Russian Federation: Federal Law of May 31, 2002 No. 63-FZ (as amended on July 31, 2020, as amended and supplemented, entered into force on March 1, 2021 ) // http://www. consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_79268/ee74ace82180199b2f8de8ca55253736488d6c66/#dst100014 (date of access: 03.14.2022). (In Russ.)
10. Code of professional ethics of a lawyer (adopted by the First All-Russian Congress of Lawyers on January 31, 2003) (as amended on April 15, 2021) // http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_448 1/3bf7e16e821457869f54dea7de27b46ddc1701f7/ (date of access: 03.14.2022). (In Russ.)
11. Alexandrov A. S., Kuchin A. F., Smolin A. G. Grounds and conditions for the implementation of a special order of trial // Russian judge. 2007. No. 9. P. 4–5. (In Russ.)
12. Tenishev A.P. Special order of trial in the criminal process of the Russian Federation: compliance with the principles and improvement of the procedural form: diss. … cand. of law. M., 2018. 197 p. (In Russ.)
13. The practice of applying the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. At 2 pm Part 2: pract. allowance / ed. V. M. Lebedev. 8th ed., revised. and additional M.: Yurait Publishing House, 2019. 303 p. (In Russ.)
14. Kolokolov N. A. Obvinenie i zaschita v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe: balans interesov – illyuziya ili real'nost' // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2006. № 1. S. 2‒3.
15. Rossinsky S. B. A special procedure for the trial as a form of proving the circumstances of a criminal case: objections to opponents // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2016. No. 4. P. 40–48. (In Russ.)
16. Burmagin S. V. Correspondence of the verdict to the inner conviction of the judge // Siberian criminal procedure and forensic readings. 2017. Issue. 1. P. 13–20. (In Russ.)
17. Criminal process: a textbook for universities / ed. V. P. Bozheva, B. Ya. Gavrilova. 7th ed., revised. and additional Moscow: Yurayt, 2020. 490 p. (In Russ.)
18. Begova D. Ya. A special procedure for making a court decision with the consent of the accused with the charges brought in the context of a fair trial // Legal Bulletin of the Dagestan State University. T. 36. 2020. No. 4. P. 148‒152. (In Russ.)
19. Mashinnikova N. O., Tatyanina L. G. Debatable issues of correlation of a special order of legal proceedings with the presumptions of the Russian criminal process // Eurasian Advocacy. 2019. No. 4. P. 35-37. (In Russ.)
20. Kolokolov N. A. Prosecution and defense in the Russian criminal process: balance of interests – illusion or reality // Criminal legal proceedings. 2006. No. 1. P. 2–3. (In Russ.)
