UDC 347.6
UDC 572
This article is devoted to a comprehensive interdisciplinary analysis of legal and ethnopsychological conflicts arising in the field of inheritance law in a multiethnic Russian society. The article examines the contradiction between the mandatory norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part Three) (hereinafter – CC RF), based on a liberal-individualistic paradigm, and traditional ethnocultural systems of inheritance based on the principles of collectivism, clan hierarchy, and a sacred attitude towards ancestral property. Based on the analysis of doctrinal positions in the field of legal anthropology (V. A. Tishkov, N. I. Novikova), civilistics (A. L. Makovsky, O. Yu. Shilokhvost), and ethnopsychology (T. G. Stefanenko), key points of tension are identified: the priority of male inheritance, the concept of the indivisibility of the «parental nest» and ancestral land, and the rejection of testamentary freedoms that limit the rights of family members. The author argues that the direct disregard of these traditions by law enforcers leads to social destabilization, while their blind legitimization undermines a unified legal framework. The paper proposes a differentiated approach that combines strict adherence to the mandatory provisions of the Russian Civil Code in judicial dispute resolution with the active use of pre-trial conciliation procedures (mediation) adapted to the cultural context. The paper substantiates the need to develop methodological recommendations for notaries and judges in multiethnic regions to identify and consider ethnocultural factors in assessing the good faith and consent of heirs, as well as to strengthen legal education, taking into account the ethnopsychological characteristics of law perception. The article concludes that inheritance law must be viewed not only as a technique for the redistribution of property, but also as a socio-psychological institution requiring a culturally sensitive approach in law enforcement.
inheritance law, ethnocultural traditions, custom, legal pluralism, Civil Code of the Russian Federation, legal anthropology, ethnopsychology, mediation, notarial practice, clash of cultures
1. Shirokogorov S. M. Ethnos. A study of the basic principles of change in ethnic and ethnographic phenomena // Ethnographic studies. Book two. Ethnos. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University Publishing House, 2002. (In Russ.)
2. Vygotsky L. S. Consciousness as a problem of behavioral psychology // Collection of Works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Pedagogy, 1982. 292 p. (In Russ.)
3. Makovsky A. L. On the codification of inheritance law (some results and prospects) // Journal of Russian law. 2020. No. 5. P. 74–85. (In Russ.)
4. Tishkov V. A. Requiem for an Ethnos: Studies in Socio-Cultural Anthropology. Moscow: Nauka, 2003. 544 p. (In Russ.)
5. Nakokhova R. R. Psychological Features of the System of Value Orientations of the Personality of Representatives of the Ethnic Groups of the North Caucasus. Moscow: Linkor, 2007. 271 p. (In Russ.)
6. Gudyma A. P. Development of indigenous peoples of the north: foundations of socio-philosophical analysis: abstract of dissertation … Doctor of Philosophy. Novosibirsk. 2005. 36 p. (In Russ.)
7. Shilokhvost O. Yu. Inheritance disputes: theory and judicial practice. Moscow: Norma, 2021. 416 p. (In Russ.)
8. Stefanenko T. G. Ethnopsychology: textbook for universities. 5th ed. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2017. 352 p. (In Russ.)
9. Timoshkina O. A. Constitutional and legal foundations of the notary’s activities in protecting the socioeconomic rights of citizens: abstract of dissertation … Cand. of Law. Moscow, 2014. 168 p. (In Russ.)
10. Shmakov V. N., Deryuga N. N. The place and role of preemptive rights in the civil legislation of Russia // Asia-Pacific Region: economics, politics, law. 2012. Vol. 14, No. 3. P. 69–73. (In Russ.)
11. Yakovleva Yu. V. Genesis of concepts about the legal phenomenon of “Abuse of law” // Historical and legal problems: A new perspective. 2022. No. 1. P. 179–192. (In Russ.)
12. Varvenko A. S., Zhelonkin S. S., Zhukavin V. V. Theoretical and legal provisions on the principle of good faith in civil law // Leningrad law journal. 2020. P. 105–113. (In Russ.)
13. Abramenkov M. S., Saraev A. G. Inheritance law. Moscow: Yurait, 2019. 346 p. (In Russ.)
14. Yuzhanin M. A. The social and legal concept of “collective rights” of ethnic groups // Sociology of power. 2012. No. 1. P. 202–211. (In Russ.)
15. Barth F. Introduction // Ethnic groups and social boundaries. Social organization of cultural differences: a collection of articles / edited by F. Barth; translated from English by I. Pilshchikov. Moscow: Novoye Izdatelstvo, 2006. 200 p. (In Russ.)
