employee
Orel Law Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia named after V.V. Lukyanov (The department of foreign and Russian languages, professor)
employee from 01.01.2017 to 01.01.2025
Orel, Orel, Russian Federation
UDC 372.881.111.1
The article examines the features of teaching adjuncts of educational institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia the art of argumentative expression in scientific discourse in English. The main objective of the study is to develop a didactic template for the formation and improvement of argumentative expression skills in the scientific field. The concept of a text-centric approach, in which a text acts as a model for the formation of communication skills, is consistently presented. Through the prism of this approach, the importance of developing the skills in analyzing and modeling structural and communicative aspects of scientific texts is shown. The types of arguments (based on reality, methodology, theory, and authority) and counterarguments (by identifying contradictory facts, by pointing out the limitations of the study, through refuting the interpretation of the results and due to putting forward a competing hypothesis) regularly used in legal research are considered. Samples of a sequential series of tasks have been developed and proposed, teaching first the analysis of fragments of scientific texts, identification of types of arguments and counterarguments, and then the sequential synthesis of argumentation and counterargumentation using an optimal communicative framework to substantiate the author's scientific position. The didactic template proposed in the article has been developed to improve the quality of training of graduate students for scientific activity and improve their research competence.
research competence, text-centric approach, scientific discourse, argumentation, communicative strategy, communicative tactic, communication framework
1. Shunyakova O. V. Classification of linguistic and cultural features of analytical work with professional police text // Bulletin of Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2024. No. 3 (105). P. 177–186. (In Russ.)
2. Shashkova V. N. The problem of classification of texts of legal discourse // Bulletin of Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2025. No. 2 (108). P. 161–167. (In Russ.)
3. Shashkova V. N. Intellectual and cognitive tasks as part of a text-centric approach to teaching cadets of educational organizations of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia the English language // The World of Pedagogy and Psychology. 2025. No. 6 (107). P. 121–130. (In Russ.)
4. Baranov A. G. Functional-pragmatic concept of the text. Rostov-on-Don, 1993. 181 p. (In Russ.)
5. Serostanova N. N., Choporova E. I. Development of research competence of adjuncts in the framework of mastering the academic course of the English language // Problems of modernization of modern higher education: linguistic aspects. Lingvomethodological problems and trends in teaching foreign languages in a non-linguistic university: Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Methodological Conference. Omsk: Omsk Armored Engineering Institute, 2019. P. 363–366. (In Russ.)
6. Sorokina S. G. Types of argumentation in scientific publications (based on English-language articles) // Science and Culture of Russia. 2013. Vol. 2. P. 219–221. (In Russ.)
7. Kostyushkina G. M., Fan Ch. Principles of analysis of argumentative denial // Society. 2024. No. 3-1 (34). P. 25–30. (In Russ.)
8. Vezhbitskaya A. Metatext in the text // New in foreign linguistics. Issue 8. Moscow: Progress, 1978. P. 402–421. (In Russ.)
9. Voronina L. V. Kognitivnye modeli i mehanizmy russkogo yuridicheskogo diskursa argumentativnogo tipa // Vestnik Ufimskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2023. № 3 (101). S. 138–145.
