UDK 343.131.5 Право на защиту. Право на обжалование
The paper reveals the significance of the unity of the legal institution of petitions and complaints, based on the unity of purpose, the discretion of the means under consideration, a single mechanism for exercising the right to petition and complaint by launching the public powers of procedural bodies into action. The conclusion is made about the significant differences between petitions and complaints as a means of protecting the rights and freedoms of persons involved in criminal proceedings from other appeals – statements, challenges, demands, opinions, speeches in debates, etc. The content of the requirements does not always correspond to how they are named in the law. The confusion in terms, characteristic of the current Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, prevents the full implementation of the right to petition and complaint, as it leaves the possibility of using non-specific means when resolving requirements for procedural bodies.
petitions, complaints, statements, challenges, opinions, debates, criminal pro ceedings
1. Nasonova I. A. Hodataystva, zhaloby, otvody: shodstva i razlichiya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2011. № 1. S. 34–38.
2. Zelenskaya Yu. E. Hodataystva, zhaloby: shodstva i razlichiya // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2014. № 1 (68). S. 33–40.
3. Yusubov A. M. Princip publichnosti v sovetskom ugolovnom processe: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 1988. 184 s.
4. Dikarev I. S. Dispozitivnost' v ugolovnom processe Rossii: monografiya / pod red. prof. A. P. Kruglikova. Volgograd, 2005. 164 s.
5. Grigor'ev V. N. O nekotoryh zamechaniyah k normativnym formulirovkam naznacheniya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2021. № 1 (63). S. 127–133.
6. Grigor'ev V. N. Normativnye formulirovka naznacheniya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i ego real'noe soderzhanie // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2021. № 2. S. 122–125.
7. Tutikova I. A. Vnesudebnyy poryadok rassmotreniya zhalob uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (v poryadke st. 124 UPK RF): avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2016. 32 s.
8. Tarasov A. A. O processual'nom statuse «zayavitel' o prestuplenii» // Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyy process. 2021. № 1. S. 131–141.
9. O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii, reguliruyuschih sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisyazhnyh zasedateley: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 22 noyabrya 2005 g. № 23 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus» http://www. consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_56702/ (data obrascheniya: 27.01.2022 g.)
10. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 17 iyulya 2012 g. № 1478-O // http://doc.ksrf.ru/decision/KSRFDecision110426.pdf (data obrascheniya: 27.01.2022 g.)
11. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 29 maya 2019 g. № 1218-O // http://doc.ksrf.ru/decision/KSRFDecision110426.pdf (data obrascheniya: 27.01.2022 g.)
12. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 20 iyulya 2021 g. № 1445-O // http://doc.ksrf.ru/decision/KSRFDecision555345.pdf (data obrascheniya: 27.01.2022 g.)
13. D'yakonova O. G. Pravo eksperta zayavlyat' hodataystva, svyazannye s naznacheniem i proizvodstvom ekspertizy, kak realizaciya ekspertnoy iniciativy // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA). 2019. № 5. S. 66–78.
