employee
Russian Federation
UDK 343 Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика
The article analyzes the prerequisites for the formation of special knowledge, carries out a historical analysis of various approaches to the concept of “special knowledge”. The complexity of investigating individual crimes necessitates the involvement of knowledgeable individuals who help the investigator and the court to resolve issues that go beyond their legal specialty. Significant criteria for distinguishing between special and non-special knowledge, as well as criteria for recognizing certain groups of persons as carriers of special knowledge, are given.
special knowledge, persons with special knowledge, legal knowledge, investigation strategy
1. Schopenhauer A. Aphorisms and Truths. M.: Eksmo-Press, 1999. (In Russ.)
2. Gross G. Guide for forensic investigators as a system of criminalistics. St. Petersburg, 1908. (In Russ.)
3. Tarasov A. A. Expert and specialist in the criminal proceedings of Russia: monograph. 2nd ed. revised and suppl. M.: Prospekt, 2017. (In Russ.)
4. Kudryavtsev A. V. The concept of “special knowledge”. Forensic support for the disclosure and investigation of crimes: textbook / ed. F. G. Amineva. Ufa: ULI of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2010. (In Russ.)
5. Orlov Yu. K. Expert’s opinion and its assessment (in criminal cases): textbook. M.: Jurist, 1995. (In Russ.)
6. Arseniev V. D., Zablotskiy V. A. The use of special knowledge in establishing the actual circumstances of a criminal case. Krasnoyarsk, 1986. (In Russ.)
7. Ishchenko P. P. Specialist in investigative actions. Criminal procedure and forensic aspects. M.: Legal literature, 1990. (In Russ.)
8. Statkus V. F. About legal expertise and “second-class” lawyers // Russian justice. 2006. No. 1. (In Russ.)
9. Eisman A. A. Expert opinion. Structure and scientific justification. M., 1967. (In Russ.)
10. Rossinskaya E. R. Profession – expert (Introduction to the legal specialty). M.: Jurist, 1999. (In Russ.)
11. Vladimirov L. E. The doctrine of criminal evidence. Tula: Autograph, 2000. (In Russ.)
12. Sokolovsky Z. M. The problem of using special knowledge in criminal proceedings to establish a causal relationship of phenomena: dis. … doc. legal Sciences. Kharkov, 1968. (In Russ.)
13. Rossinskaya E. R. Judicial examination in civil, arbitration, administrative and criminal proceedings. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. M.: Norma, 2008. (In Russ.)
14. Zinin A. M. Participation of a forensic specialist in procedural actions: a textbook. Moscow: Prospekt, 2011. (In Russ.)
15. Averyanova T. V. Forensic examination. General theory course. M.: Norma, 2006. (In Russ.)
