CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF EQUALITY, UNITY OF THE PEOPLE OF RUSSIA AND MANIFESTATIONS OF CRIMINAL LAW MOTIVES OF HATRED AND ENMITY (PART ONE)
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The study includes the problems of the history and theory of the state and law of Russia, partly philosophy, political science, sociology, ontology, psychology on the issues of criminal manifestation of negatives generated by the low culture of man in views, assessments and interpretations of racial, ethnic, national differences. Social contradictions are further exacerbated by the desires of individuals to put themselves above all, based on signs of material "superiority” or the presence of any kind or sphere of manifestation of a powerful "resource”. Such manifestations in the sphere of religious relations are especially complex in their “refinement" with reference to the “higher will" and strength. Criminal legislation and doctrine normatively and theoretically reflect these problems. A number of qualified types of crimes with the corresponding dangerous motivation of the perpetrators are defined in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The authors of this work offer readers and researchers the structure of the work under one name, consisting of two parts. Each part of the material is planned to be published sequentially in different issues of one publication. Such structuring allows us to independently separate general material into two blocks, each of which is capable of carrying relatively separate, but unified knowledge about the formation of criminal extremist behavior that arose from the moment people began interacting, accompanied and continues to accompany the entire life of mankind, but manifested itself in a unique way at different times, with its own characteristics in a number of ethnic groups, racial and social formations, in countries, states and communities, including those in power, in the procedures of the Inquisition, the essence and practice of Nazism, religious radicalism, etc. This made it possible to isolate the general sources and reasons for human aggression and purely special issues in the history of the formation of this type of crime, at the stages of the history of society and in specific forms of its manifestation, as specific human criminal aggression. In order to gain a more complete understanding of the peculiarities of the formation of the multi-ethnic and multinational society of Russia, for proper everyday speculation and adequate doctrinal perception of assessments of the essence and nature of the scale of social processes, changes in their content throughout the centuries-old historical path of Russia, the authors note that the formation of the multinational society of Russia, its statehood took place with the determining ethnic, social, organizational and political vector of the predominance of the Russian principle. The first part of the work examines, summarizes and outlines in general terms the results of the analysis of complex problems of the formation of statehood and domestic state policy since the reign of Catherine II, when contradictions emerged between the ruling and dominant elite, feudal-serfdom foundations in the peasant organization and the dispossessed peasantry on social and partly ethnic issues. The key points of the policy of Soviet Russia and the USSR in the field of political, economic, social renewal of all aspects of people's life and the role of national, international aspects in it on the scale of the common culture of all nations on socialist principles are outlined with strokes. The sources and reasons for the collapse of the USSR are noted. The author's characteristics of the state and society in the initial post-Soviet period in Russia and the modern Russian Federation are given. An assessment is given of the stability of reality and the strength of the desire of the majority of the country's workers to preserve the foundations of the socialist economy and social structure of society, the political and Soviet organization of power. This is a necessary condition for the existence and development of a single Fatherland for all and the implementation of the principles of equality, national accord, relatively significant for all citizens social and personal well-being, spiritually permeated with healthy and comradely relations between people for the sake of preserving a single equally accessible, equally sufficient and noble social good for everyone and each individual person. The economic, social and moral losses of all the peoples of the republics that were part of the USSR were noted, artificially caused by the escalation in certain regions of the country of discussions and polemics on issues of intentions and their decisions on “benevolent” actions to gain sovereignty and freedom, which ultimately led to separatism and the collapse of the USSR, and then the subsequent justifications of their actions to gain “real freedom” in the tenacious “embraces” of the insatiable world of capital. These were groundless and unfounded “arguments" in favor of solving eternal insoluble or difficult to solve problems: “inequality”, “lack of freedom”, “dependence”, “subordination”, “restraint of development”, “arrogance”, as well as manifestations of the dualism of dialectics: leader – follower, leader – outsider, self-sufficient – burdened with problems, etc. The second part of the study is devoted to criminological and criminal-legal problems of crime and types of crimes of an extremist nature, generated by pronounced social inequality of citizens in society, as well as contradictions arising from different levels of personal culture, ambiguous religious ideas and beliefs, racial and ethnic misconceptions.

Keywords:
ethnos, multinational Fatherland, socialism, collapse of the USSR, post-Soviet criminalization, loss of socialist values, capitalist demoralization, hatred, enmity
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Ivannikov I. A. Slavic peoples and their unions: state and legal aspect: monograph. Rostov-on-Don – Taganrog, 2024. 180 p. (In Russ.)

2. Ivannikov I. A. State sovereignty of Russia in the context of external threats // Economy. Law. Society. 2024. Vol. 9. No. 4 (40). P. 21–26. (In Russ.)

3. Malikov B. Z. Criminal law concept of sabotage and responsibility for it in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods of Russian history // Criminal policy: yesterday, today, tomorrow: Proceedings of the III International scientific and practical conference. Ryazan, 2025. P. 56–59. (In Russ.)

Login or Create
* Forgot password?