employee
UDC 343.1
The author analyzes the theoretical aspects of the institute of suspension of preliminary investigation, identifies gaps and contradictions in its normative regulation, as well as suggests ways to improve the legislation. Special attention is paid to issues of terminological unification, expansion of grounds for suspension, ensuring the protection of the rights of participants in the proceedings and the introduction of digital technologies into criminal proceedings. Based on a comprehensive study, specific recommendations have been formulated for the modernization of the institute of suspension, aimed at achieving a balance between the effectiveness of the investigation and compliance with the principles of fair justice.
suspension of preliminary investigation, criminal proceedings, procedural deadlines, grounds for suspension, protection of participants in the proceedings, international legal assistance, artificial intelligence, reforming of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, reasonable time limits for legal proceedings, immunity in criminal proceedings
1. Mordvinov A. V. Procedural terms: features of establishment and calculation during preliminary investigation: diss. ... Cand. of Law. Izhevsk, 2021. 252 p. (In Russ.)
2. Cherkasova A. M. Controversial issues in calculating the terms of preliminary investigation // Man and society in contradictions and consent: collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the International scientific and theoretical conference. Nizhny Novgorod, 2022. P. 363–366. (In Russ.)
3. Nuriev I. N. On the issue of the need to differentiate the terms of preliminary investigation depending on the category of the crime committed // Bulletin of the Far Eastern Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022. No. 1 (58). P. 10–17. (In Russ.)
4. Isaeva R. M., Latypov V. S. Procedural deadlines in criminal proceedings in Russia // Modern problems of criminal proceedings: solutions: collection of materials of the 2nd International Conference. Ufa: Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2021. P. 142–148. (In Russ.)
5. Zatsepina M. N. Reasonable time limit for legal proceedings in criminal proceedings in Russia: concept, content, legal means of implementation: author’s abstract. diss. ... Cand. of Law. Sciences. Moscow, 2016. 30 p. (In Russ.)
6. Kunov I. M. Legal nature of the investigator’s activities in a suspended criminal case // Humanitarian, socio-economic and social sciences. 2017. No. 8-9. P. 199–203. (In Russ.)
7. Lisitsyna A. V. Modern scientific approaches to understanding the activities of authorized state bodies and officials before the resumption of a suspended preliminary investigation // Criminal proceedings: current state and development strategy: collection of scientific papers of the XIII All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Moscow: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V. Ya. Kikot, 2024. P. 109–111. (In Russ.)
8. Latypov V. S. Institute of suspension of preliminary investigation: issues of theory and normative regulation // LexRussica (Russian law). 2022. Vol. 75. No. 10 (191). P. 95–104. (In Russ.)
9. Grinenko A. V. Suspension of preliminary investigation: legislative and law enforcement problems // Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Jurisprudence. 2018. No. 1. P. 139–148. (In Russ.)
10. Yakubovich N. A. Suspension and resumption of preliminary investigation in the aspect of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of 2001 // Criminal Law. 2002. No. 2. P. 79–82. (In Russ.)
11. Zakirova E. F. Suspension of preliminary investigation in cases where the suspect or accused has hidden from the investigation or his whereabouts is not established for other reasons: author's abstract. diss. ... Cand. of Law. Izhevsk, 2004. 29 p. (In Russ.)
12. Gruzdev V. V. Concept of force majeure // Bulletin of arbitration practice. 2024. No. 1 (110). P. 39–47. (In Russ.)
13. Smirnova M. G. Classification of force majeure circumstances in civilistic science of the digital society period // Journal of Russian Law. 2024. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 152–163. (In Russ.)
14. Sibilev I. A. On the issue of determining the essence of the phenomena of “case” and “force majeure” in the mechanism of civil liability for breach of contractual obligations // Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Legal sciences. 2024. Vol. 10 (76). No. 1. P. 394–401. (In Russ.)
15. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Detecting, Solving, Investigating of Crimes and Consideration of Criminal Cases in Court / D. V. Bakhteyev, E. A. Buglaeva, A. I. Zazulin et al. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publishing House, 2022. 216 p. (In Russ.)
16. Malina M. A. Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Administration of Justice in Criminal Cases: Problems and Prospects // State and Law. 2022. No. 1. P. 91–97. (In Russ.)
17. Ryabtseva E. V. The Problem of Using Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice // All-Russian Criminological Journal. 2023. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 73–80. (In Russ.)
18. Rodikova V. A. Artificial Intelligence vs. Judicial Discretion: cannot be trusted verify. Prospects and risks of automation of judicial practice // Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation. 2023. No. 10. P. 114–131. (In Russ.)
